Thursday, February 21, 2013

Reid gets Board to back helping restore VRT funding


Supervisor Ken Reid (R-Leesburg), who put forward the motion, pointed out that the Town of Leesburg has been working diligently on the funding problem, even traveling repeatedly to Richmond.
“I think it is incumbent upon this Board of Supervisors to work more closely with our delegation,” he said. “We have an opportunity with both of these bills going to conference to provide at least some level of funding.”
http://www.leesburgtoday.com/news/loudoun-board-to-push-state-for-vrt-funding/article_2bcb1f8c-778e-11e2-8e71-001a4bcf887a.html
http://www.leesburgtoday.com/news/classification-change-threatens-loudoun-bus-system-funding/article_2a3f1788-5f59-11e2-9579-0019bb2963f4.html

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Reid, 4 other supervisors get Chairman’s Award from Loudoun Chamber for Metro vote


Before turning the Chamber over to White, (Outgoing Chamber President Kurt) Krause took the time to remember some of the seminal moments of 2012, the most important of which was the approval of the Silver Line project by the Loudoun Board of Supervisors. Krause and Chamber president and CEO Tony Howard presented the five supervisors who voted in favor of the project—Chairman Scott K. York (R-At Large), Vice Chairman Shawn Williams (R-Broad Run) and Supervisors Ralph Buona (R-Ashburn), Matt Letourneau (R-Dulles) and Ken Reid (R-Leesburg)—with a plaque recognizing their willingness to “take heat from a segment of their constituency” while maintaining their “vision of Loudoun no longer wanting to be a bedroom community for Fairfax County.”
Click here for the rest of the article:
http://www.leesburgtoday.com/news/chamber-celebrates-community-leaders-passes-the-gavel-to-new-chairman/article_c48fd78e-6bf0-11e2-a796-0019bb2963f4.html?mode=image&photo=0

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Reid Seeks Tweaks To Gov’t Support Center Plans

Reid Seeks Tweaks To Gov’t Support Center Plans


Posted: Monday, January 14, 2013 12:55 pm | Updated: 2:54 pm, Mon Jan 14, 2013.
County supervisors, so far, are backing the proposed master plan for the government support center site off Sycolin Road, but have agreed to consider two changes to the Juvenile Detention Center and proposed office buildings to address concerns of nearby residents.
During the Transportation/Land Use Committee meeting Friday, Supervisor Ken Reid (R-Leesburg) brought up the idea of expanding the JDC at its existing location on Loudoun Center Place, instead of its proposed new location off Crosstrail Boulevard.
Reid proposed the idea of rearranging the third phase of the Adult Detention Center so the county did not have to spend another $16 million to build a new JDC, but the county Capital Budget Manager Daniel Csizmar said rearranging the ADC would not eliminate the need for a new jail for juvenile offenders.
“The current facility is not adequate,” he said. “The populations are mixed and there is no way to remedy that.” He said the mixing of violent and non-violent offenders has created some safety concerns for some inmates.
Reid said he would like to see the option of expanding the existing center rather than building a new facility explored further.
Reid said he wanted plans for a new warehouse and office space moved away from Kincaid Boulevard, which is next to an existing residential neighborhood, and suggested moving those uses to the site proposed for the new JDC. He said the office and warehouse uses would put “an average of 200 trucks a day” on Kincaid Boulevard, which bisects the neighborhood.
“All I can tell you is that from a land use standpoint putting the consolidated shops and warehouse off Kincaid Boulevard is wasting prime virgin land where you could put a government center,” Reid said, referring to the potential need to expand the county’s government offices in the future. “I think the space of Kincaid Boulevard is really prime for office.”
Chairman Scott K. York (R-At Large) noted that it would be within the board’s discretion to put limitations on truck traffic since the trucks would all be from county vendors. “If the board chose to continue with this particular plan [we could] restrict all truck traffic associated with the warehouse to come in through Cross trail Boulevard and then have to take a right out on Crosstrail.”
Reid also noted the extension of Miller Drive has been proposed to be removed from the master plan, which would give the county more development layout options. But Supervisor Suzanne Volpe (R-Algonkian) pointed out that it was only a proposal at this point and “it is not done until it is done.”
“You can’t assume that changes are going to be made or that everyone is going to say that this is what we are going to do,” she said, referring to the full board. “Staff is saying this is what is currently planned; that is what they have to do.”
The committee agreed to look at the two options for the JDC and warehouse space, but some supervisors indicated they were not likely to back any changes when it came time for final action.
Also proposed on the master plan are some new facilities at the fire-rescue training center, a women’s shelter, a transit maintenance facility, a juvenile probation residence, a mental health residential facility, and an adolescent independent living facility, among others.
The Transportation/Land Use Committee also backed the use of a 19-acre proffered site off Shreve Mill Road south of Leesburg for the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office next firing range and planned Leesburg South fire-rescue station.
Supervisors took a step back from the plan in December, citing concerns that the School Board had not been formally approached about its intent to use the site for an elementary school. Originally the land had been designated for a school, but the school system’s planning staff said it would not be adequate for its needs. However, supervisors wanted to hear that directly from the School Board.
School Board Chairman Eric Hornberger (Ashburn) sent a Jan. 8 letter confirming the school system has no plans to use the site in the future.
With that response, the committee backed the collocation of the fire-rescue station and the indoor firing range, potentially bringing to rest one of the most debated public safety facilities in the county.
The need for a new firing range for the sheriff’s office has long been known, as the current arrangement on Dulles Airport property is not sufficient to meet the agency’s growing needs. Plans for another stand-alone facility were scrapped by the previous Board of Supervisors. In a letter to the county, Maj. Eric Noble said the Shreve Mill property “has a number of attractive features” including easy access to the Dulles Greenway, collocation with the fire-rescue station, and existing landscape buffering. Also, he noted, the site is located close to the sheriff’s office headquarters in Leesburg.
The idea of building an indoor firing range on the government support center site was floated back in December—and repeated by Reid Friday—but Noble said the sheriff’s office had concerns placing the facility so close to a residential neighborhood, indoor or not.
“What we were struck by, is besides the neighborhood it is also proximate to ballfields and potential pedestrian paths,” Noble said of the government support center location. “There is a perceptual concern, if nothing else. As deputies are exiting their vehicles with rifles and shotguns, how will the public feel about that?”
He said the sheriff’s office leadership was concerned about creating worry among parents at the ballfields or residents in their neighborhood or on the paths when they see a high police presence with heavy arms. “We make safety our number one priority, but perception is always a concern. The last thing I want to do is leave people with worry that we are not going to operate safely in their neighborhood.”
Noble noted the Shreve Mill Road location is much more isolated with natural buffering the sheriff’s office can use.
Leaders in Loudoun County Fire-Rescue said the Shreve Mill site was optimal for providing service south of Leesburg.
“It fills our coverage gaps,” Deputy Chief Howard Dawley said. “It will effectively extend coverage onto Rt. 15 south. [The location] does a very effective job of citing this facility for maximum coverage.”
Reid did express concern that Shreve Mill Road would need to be paved to give the fire-rescue personnel full ingress and egress from the site. Csizmar said the paving is in the proposed in the county’s Capital Improvements Plan, but that he could not say the total cost until the CIP is presented as part of the FY14 budget.
Because he said he was concerned about how long it would take to pave the road, Reid suggested a couple other sites—Meadowbrook and Oaklawn properties among them—but Fire-Rescue Chief W. Keith Brower, Jr. said other sites had been considered.
“We’re trying to maintain a strategic advantage, especially to the south side,” he said. That is beginning to be an area that is getting to be built up…The further we are from Leesburg the less strategic we are.”
The full board will take up the proposed master plan at a future business meeting.

Friday, January 4, 2013

Friday, December 28, 2012

Loudoun School Budget 2014

Boards discuss FY 14 schools budget
At the initiation of the Joint Board of Supervisors/School Board Committee, which I co-chair, both boards met Dec. 19 to discuss the upcoming FY '14 schools budget. This meeting may have been a first.

Naturally, the School Board feels it is in a tough position to make $56 million in cuts out of a nearly $877 million proposed budget in order for the Board of Supervisors to deliver on cutting taxes a second year in a row.

There is a good article linked below, but some other comments at the meeting were omitted:

1. Both At-Large School Board Member Tom Reed and I reminded everyone about the pending sequestration "Fiscal Cliff," which could raise taxes on all Americans come Jan. 1 AND force layoffs of thousands of Loudoun County residents who work for the U.S. government or federal contractors. Tom said: "The fiscal cliff in Loudoun will be a higher cliff with rocks at the bottom." He is correct.
2. Because of this, I told the panels I would not be interested in any increases in taxes or spending on the County side - -except what the Schools need to accommodate about 2,550 more new students, and funds to meet higher costs. No-one in LCPS could give me a targeted cost-per-pupil efficiency, or provide any data on where funds can't be cut due to mandated state and federal programs.
3. The desire of the Board of Supervisors to cut taxes has been known to the School Board since September when it was unanimously approved by our Finance Committee. The School Board has had ample time to review benefits and personnel -- in reality since last spring when the last budget closed. This is a great School Board, which made heroic cuts last year, and I continue to believe they are going to make Loudoun Schools better -- in large part because they are a diligent bunch of people.
4. The Government Reform and Restructuring Commission has tried since the summer to get cooperation from the LCPS staff on its efforts to SAVE tax dollars by consolidating duplicative staffing in County and LCPS -- like construction, mapping and printing. Dr. Hatrick has pretty much stonewalled this effort, which came to light at our Joint Schools Committee meeting. As a result, the School Board has nothing concrete it can get from the Reform Commission on areas to cut in the coming budget.
5. I floated the idea at the meeting of using special tax districts on new developments to defray some of the cost of future schools construction. It is capital costs, both on the County and Schools side, that is what leads to more debt and higher taxes.

My 2011 campaign platform was NOT to "hurt the schools" but to HELP THE TEACHERS and STUDENTS and cut back on administrative areas, capital construction by expanding school sizes and programs that do not add value. All of these ideas, so far, have not received much acceptance from the School Board, nor some of my colleagues on the Board of Supervisors.

But so far, neither my BOS colleagues nor School Board members have taken up the charge on these ideas.

Furthermore, if you talk to classroom teachers, they will tell you how much they are gypped on supplies and other needs -- some of which they have to pay for out of pocket! I believe this is unreasonable, yet to not require more out-of-pocket for health insurance for part timers.

Finally, it is very possible - unless we are pushed over the "Fiscal Cliff" -- that Loudoun could get MORE tax revenue in 2014 due to rising assessments and all the resistance from the School Board will be for naught.

But even if Loudoun were awash with funds, I would not waiver one bit, nor should my colleagues, on the goal to INCREASE FUNDS for the CLASSROOM and REDUCE funding in areas that add little value -- like administration.

Therefore, I sincerely hope this great reform-minded School Board we elected will make the necessary cuts and reallocations to areas most in need -- our teachers and students.

Article on joint meeting on budget
Article on schools budget

Reid gets Peterson to withdraw courts expansion proposal

Peterson wirthdraws proposal to house courts after Leesburg's Reid's request

The Peterson Company withdrew their proposal to house the courts expansion at the Crosstrail property near the Dulles Greenway after pressure from Leesburg District Supervisor Ken Reid.

Reid said on his Facebook page : "I am pleased the Peterson Co. withdrew their proposal to provide land to build an entirely new courts complex on the Crosstrail property at Battlefield Pwy. and the Dulles Greenway. I had asked them to withdraw it, and they did. It is now time to move on and have the Town of Leesburg work out regulatory issues with the County so the courts can be expanded in downtown Leesburg."

http://www.loudountimes.com/index.php/news/article/developers_land_offer_for_courts_complex_off_the_table/


Here is Jon Peterson's letter to the Board of Supervisors...





December 4, 2012

Ralph M. Buona, Chairman
Finance/Government Services and Operations Committee
Loudoun County Board of Supervisors
1 Harrison Street, S.E., Fifth Floor
Leesburg, Virginia 20177

Re:       Expansion of the Loudoun County Courts Complex
Dear Chairman Buona:
I am writing to follow up on my letter to you of November 19, 2012 wherein I laid out a proposal to gift to Loudoun County land owned by The Peterson Cos. within the Town at its Crosstrail project.  As I described in that letter, we believe that a relocation of the Loudoun County Courts Complex from its current location in Downtown Leesburg would serve both the County and Town well in many ways, including the potential to create a more efficient and cost effective expansion of the Courts Complex while simultaneously retaining Leesburg’s status as the County Seat.  As I further noted in my letter, there are many other arguments in favor of this relocation.
Since November 19th, I have had an opportunity to speak with numerous stakeholders on this issue.  They have brought to bear arguments in favor and in opposition to our proposal, and I have appreciated hearing these points.  Their comments further illuminated our understanding of the County’s and Town’s respective needs.
Based on those discussions, it is my conclusion that while a relocation of the Courts Complex to a Town site at Crosstrail has many merits, it has become obvious that capable representatives from both The Town of Leesburg and Loudoun County have extensively evaluated the circumstances surrounding this matter.  In doing so, it appears that the two parties have mutually agreed upon a long term solution that will keep the location of The Loudoun Counties Courts Complex in its existing location in downtown Leesburg.
Given that fact, and given our desire to work with both The Town of Leesburg and Loudoun County to promote both the future economic development potential of Crosstrail and its premier employment opportunities, I must respectfully withdraw our proposal to gift land to Loudoun County for the relocation of the Courts Complex to Crosstrail
 I thank you for your consideration.


Very truly yours,
Jon Peterson
Senior Vice President